| |
From
the previous result, there might arise
another question:
How much lower could the output
(MW) be so that the additional investment
for the open cooling water cycle still
reaches a three year Pay-Off Time? |
| |
| Spemann
PG-ROI quickly finds the solution
with the goal-seek analysis: 717.89
MW. |
| |
|
|
xx |
 |
| |
| Even
if the output dropped with the open cycle
compared to the cooling tower, the additional
investment still would pay off within three
years, due to the savings of fuel costs from
higher efficiency. |
|
